Don’t Let Your Quality Control Systems Become Sources of Error

Automated inspection systems are designed to boost manufacturing quality—but without the right reliability strategy, they can become hidden sources of error. Miscommunication between software, sensors, and controllers can lead to uninspected parts, undetected failures, or faulty data—all of which can derail production goals.

So how do you ensure the machines designed to reduce error don’t introduce new ones?

Automation Requires Accountability

Just a few years ago, quality control was largely the job of human inspectors. But fatigue during late shifts, inconsistent judgment, and varying levels of experience all contributed to errors. Today, in-line automated inspection systems offer consistent, objective evaluations that free up employees for tasks requiring human oversight.

But machines need oversight too. Without clear logic, real-time checks, and error detection protocols, your inspection system can fail silently—producing a false sense of security.

Siemens-Based Inline Inspection: A Practical Example

Let’s look at a typical high-speed manufacturing line using a Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 PLC in conjunction with a Siemens MV440 Optical Reader (6GF3440‑0GE11) and TIA Portal diagnostics to manage inline quality inspection of machined metal parts.

• The MV440 captures high-resolution images at high cycle rates to inspect each part for dimensional accuracy and surface flaws.
• The PLC initiates image capture, routes the data, and processes inspection results.
• TIA Portal diagnostics constantly verify system feedback—ensuring each image has been processed before a new one is captured.

If a processing bottleneck is detected (e.g., image backlog or delayed response), the PLC flags the issue, halts the inspection routine, and alerts operators immediately. This kind of intelligent interlock prevents unnoticed inspection failures and enforces “every part, every time” standards.

Addressing Common Automation Errors with Siemens Hardware

Automated inspection is more than just cameras and software. It requires real-time coordination between sensors, actuators, and logic layers to prevent systemic errors.

For instance:

• If a defective part is detected, it must be removed completely.
• In a stamping process, a Siemens inductive proximity sensor confirms the actuator stroke, while a light curtain validates part removal.
• The PLC cross-checks these signals before allowing the next part to enter the station.

If one step fails—no part moves forward. This level of coordination ensures defects are not just detected but physically removed, with no gaps in accountability.

Designing for Reliability: The Siemens Approach

System design plays a critical role in preventing errors. Siemens advocates for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) during the design phase. This includes:

• Identifying critical points where errors could occur
• Evaluating the effects of missed steps or sensor faults
• Designing logic that can detect, isolate, and respond to those errors in real time

In Siemens automation systems, these principles are reinforced through the use of integrated safety PLCs, diagnostic-enabled IO, and centralized logging via WinCC or Edge Runtime. It’s a layered approach that turns inspection into a closed-loop, validated process.

Final Thought: Don’t Let Automation Blind Spots Undermine Quality

Automation doesn’t eliminate the need for vigilance—it just changes where you focus. If your inspection system isn't actively verifying its own performance, you're vulnerable to blind spots that could cost thousands in rework, recalls, or line downtime.

With Siemens inspection systems and PLC logic, you can build in the checks and balances needed to maintain high throughput without compromising quality.

Need help retrofitting your inspection station or sourcing Siemens components?
Contact Industrial Automation Co. for expert guidance and fast shipping on in-stock Siemens automation parts_