What’s the Difference Between a PLC and a PAC?

In industrial automation, choosing the right control system is crucial—but the line between PLCs and PACs isn't always clear. Are they the same thing? Is one just a newer version of the other? The short answer: not quite.

While both PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers) and PACs (Programmable Automation Controllers) are designed to control machines and processes, they differ in architecture, functionality, and scope. In this blog, we’ll break down those differences, explore when to use each, and give you a comparison chart to simplify your decision-making process.

What Is a PLC?

A Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) is a ruggedized industrial computer used to control machinery and processes. Originally developed in the 1960s to replace relay-based control panels, PLCs are built for high reliability, real-time performance, and ease of programming in industrial environments.

PLCs are especially suited for discrete automation tasks—things like turning motors on or off, opening valves, or monitoring switches. They excel in applications where repeatable logic must execute quickly and dependably.

• Uses ladder logic or function block programming
• Real-time I/O scanning and processing
• Built for harsh industrial conditions (vibration, heat, dust)
• Typically controls a single machine or system
• Limited memory and data-handling capabilities

Common PLC Use Cases:

• Conveyor belt sequencing
• Packaging machines
• Bottle-filling systems
• HVAC and lighting control

What Is a PAC?

A Programmable Automation Controller (PAC) is a more advanced control system that evolved from traditional PLCs. PACs combine the reliability of a PLC with the processing power and flexibility of a PC-based system.

PACs are ideal for complex, data-heavy, or networked applications. They typically support multiple programming languages, offer high-speed data processing, and include built-in communication for integration with SCADA, MES, or remote systems.

• Modular architecture with powerful CPUs
• Supports structured text, ladder logic, and more
• Built-in Ethernet/IP, Modbus, and other protocols
• Uses tag-based memory for easier programming
• Designed to control entire systems or multi-zone operations

Common PAC Use Cases:

• Automotive manufacturing with robotics
• Food and beverage plants with centralized process control
• Water treatment systems with remote monitoring
• Facilities integrating IT and OT systems

Key Differences Between PLCs and PACs

While PLCs and PACs may look similar on the surface—and in some cases, overlap in functionality—their underlying design, capabilities, and intended applications reveal key differences.

Feature	PLC	PAC
Architecture	Fixed or modular	Modular, PC-style
Processing Power	Moderate	High
Memory Structure	Fixed addressing	Tag-based
Programming Languages	Ladder Logic	Multiple (Ladder, ST, FBD)
Application Scope	Machine-level control	Plant-wide/multi-system
Networking/Comms	Add-on modules	Built-in protocols
Best For	Simple tasks	Complex, integrated systems
Cost	Lower	Higher (scalable)

Key Takeaway: PLCs are ideal for standalone machines or basic logic, while PACs shine in high-performance, multi-device, data-centric environments.

When to Use a PLC

• Discrete I/O control and basic logic
• Simple machine operation with minimal networking
• Legacy system support
• Quick response time and high reliability

Examples: Packaging lines, bottling machines, elevator systems

When to Use a PAC

• High-speed or multitasking logic
• Data logging, processing, and remote access
• Integration with SCADA, MES, or ERP
• Distributed I/O and complex automation systems

Examples: Automotive manufacturing, water treatment, food and beverage processing

Real-World Examples

PLC Example – Packaging Conveyor: Simple on/off motor control with sensors and actuators. Fast, cost-effective control using an Allen-Bradley MicroLogix PLC.

PAC Example – Automotive Plant: Integrated robotics, servo drives, and data collection using a Rockwell ControlLogix PAC.

Water Plant Example: Distributed control, alarms, and trending with a Siemens S7-1500 PAC.

Final Takeaway

The choice isn’t about old vs. new—it’s about choosing the right controller for the job. A PLC offers reliable, low-cost control for simple machines. A PAC brings power, flexibility, and communication to complex systems. Know your application—and choose accordingly.

Explore Our PLCs and PACs

At Industrial Automation Co., we stock thousands of PLCs and PACs from trusted brands like Allen-Bradley, Siemens, and Mitsubishi. Whether you’re maintaining a legacy system or upgrading to something smarter, we can help.

✅ Browse Our In-Stock PLCs
✅ Explore PAC Systems Like ControlLogix

Need help? Contact our sales team today—we’ll help you find the right part for your system and budget.